List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Determine theoretical performance | 1.1 | Identify item of plant or equipment to be analysed |
| 1.2 | Locate and interpret design specification |
| 1.3 | Identify process materials being, or to be, processed during verification trial |
| 1.4 | Determine process material properties under process conditions |
| 1.5 | Calculate theoretical performance of components with that material under those conditions |
|
2 | Conduct trial | 2.1 | Design verification trial to be compatible with theoretical analysis |
| 2.2 | Determine measurements needed from trial to yield required data |
| 2.3 | Select equipment suitable to give required measurements |
| 2.4 | Arrange for verification trial with relevant process personnel |
| 2.5 | Set up required measurement equipment |
| 2.6 | Supervise trial and ensure trial conditions are appropriate |
| 2.7 | Collect trial data for analysis |
|
3 | Verify performance of plant/equipment | 3.1 | Compare theoretical with actual performance |
| 3.2 | Determine significance of variation between theoretical and actual performance |
| 3.3 | Investigate any suspicious results and take action |
|
4 | Recommend required action | 4.1 | Determine action to bring performance to desired level |
| 4.2 | Initiate the corrective action in accordance with company procedures |
| 4.3 | Determine measures to increase equipment productivity |
| 4.4 | Re-check performance after corrective action is implemented |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
design and implement verification trial appropriate to the plant/equipment, theoretical analysis and required data
undertake theoretical/mathematical and practical analysis of the process
recommended changes that are justified based on the comparison of trial and theoretical data
calculate equipment and component performance from the design specification
determine equipment and design performance from practical trials
determine the 'limiting component' in the performance of an item of equipment or a process
determine possible performance of an item of equipment/process if practical improvements were made to the 'limiting item'
predict interactions between materials, equipment and process and their impacts on performance.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to analyse equipment performance, including knowledge of:
methods of identifying and calculating theoretical performance
ways of trialling, trial design and implementation
methods of data analysis to determine trial outcomes
methods of interpreting information deduced from trial data
all items on a schematic (e.g. piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) and process flow diagrams (PFDs) of the system and the function and principles of operation of each
systems operating parameters
system integrity limits
process control philosophies and strategies
process parameters and limits
product specifications and tolerances
principles of operation of plant/equipment
science (e.g. physics, chemistry and biochemistry) relevant to process and materials
organisation procedures
duty of care obligations
hierarchy of control.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or practical, assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Simulation may be used for part only of this unit.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.